kapyn
Compare AI modelsHead to head

Claude Opus vs GPT Sol

Two mid-frontier models, now that GPT-6 Astra sits above Sol and Claude Fable 5.1 sits above Opus. Sol is the broader generalist; Opus 5.5 leads on agentic and coding work and is the model Anthropic itself tells you to start with. At $4 and $20 per million tokens, Opus 5.5 costs twice as much as Sol's $2 and $10, so the deciding factor is whether that agentic edge justifies double the bill.

Claude OpusGPT Sol
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Current releaseOpus 5.5GPT-6.1 Sol
TierFrontierFrontier
Context1M1M
CostPremiumModerate
Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision
Open weightsNoNo

Cost is a tier, not a quote, providers change prices often. Check Anthropic and OpenAI before you commit. Last updated 2026-10-21.

Which one to pick

Claude OpusAnthropic · Opus 5.5

Agentic coding and multi-step engineering work, near the ceiling at a fraction of the price

Reach for it when
  • Multi-step agentic coding where the model runs for a long time without supervision
  • Large refactors that must respect an existing codebase's conventions
  • You want reasoning-effort control to trade cost against depth
GPT SolOpenAI · GPT-6.1 Sol

Frontier-grade generalist work now that Astra has taken the top of the line

Reach for it when
  • You are already deep in OpenAI tooling and want the least migration friction
  • Half the token cost on the same class of work
  • General knowledge and scientific work rather than shipping code
See the full model matrix

Related comparisons